From the end of this month, the right to request flexible working will be available to all employees with 26 weeks’ service – not just those with children and some types of carers.
The procedure is being simplified as well. The time limits on each stage of the process are gone. Instead, once an individual has made a request the employer has three months to consider it, discuss it with the employee and make a decision. The application must also be dealt with in a reasonable manner.
Employees can still only make one request per year and the eight reasons for refusing a request remain the same as before, namely:
An interesting change is that an employer can now treat a request as withdrawn if, without good reason, the employee fails to attend two successive meetings to discuss the request. It’s hard to see why an applicant would miss two such meetings without good cause so this may of little practical importance.
If you would like to discuss the changes or you need help in responding to a request, please contact one of our specialists on 020 7234 0200 or contact@waterfront.law
The Workers (Predictable Terms and Conditions) Act 2023, creates a statutory right for qualifying workers to request a more predictable pattern of work. This right works similarly in a few ways to the right to request a more flexible working pattern.
In the news this week has been the speculation over Manchester United’s decision in respect of their player, Mason Greenwood. Greenwood was charged with rape and assault, but the charges – which he denies – were dropped back in February. We learnt yesterday that Greenwood’s time with the…
The Employment Relations (Flexible Working) Bill has now completed its journey through parliament and the Employment Relations (Flexible Working) Act 2023 is currently awaiting Royal Assent. What is changing?
Fans of Radio 4’s The Archers will be aware that Brian has sacked Stella as the manager of Home Farm. The background is that Stella spent £150,000 on a new seed drill without Brian’s approval so he has decided to treat the matter as gross misconduct and dismiss her with immediate effect. Stella has taken advice and has been told that she has a good claim of unfair dismissal and possibly sex discrimination too (apparently on the basis that so few farm managers are women). Leaving aside for one moment the fact that The Archers is a work of fiction, does Stella have a claim?