In the recently published post Waterfront Law – The IPEC Guide, we highlighted the “costs cap” as a feature of IPEC that is of real benefit to litigants.
This is because a party can be confident that, should it lose in IPEC on liability (i.e. usually the decision on whether there has been infringement), there is a maximum amount it will usually be ordered to pay towards the other side’s legal costs. That amount is currently £50,000.
On 1 October 2022, the costs cap will increase to £60,000.[1]
In IPEC, the overall costs cap is broken down by stages of the litigation. There is a limit on how much a winning party can recover in respect of the amount spent on specific stages of the litigation (e.g. drafting its Defence).
These limits will also increase on 1 October 2022 as set out below:[2]
As a final point, the courts have held that where a Claimant obtains a result in litigation that at least equals a “Part 36” settlement offer it has made to the Defendant(s), the costs cap regime technically falls away, but that in practice the court will usually proceed as if a 25% uplift has been applied to both the overall costs cap and each of the stage caps detailed above.[3] Therefore, in those very specific circumstances, from 1 October 2022 a winning Claimant could recover costs of up to £75,000.
[1] Civil Procedure (Amendment No 2) Rules 2022 (SI 2022/783)
[2] 149th Practice Direction Update
[3] Martin & Anor v Kogan & Ors [2017] EWHC 3266 (IPEC)
A recent EU trade mark application for the word mark, PUT PUTIN IN, has been refused by the European Union Intellectual Property Office on the grounds of being contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality. While a fairly straightforward decision, this is a timely reminder…
Late yesterday UK time, it was reported that a lawyer for Twitter had sent a letter to Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg complaining about Meta’s new Threads app. Twitter claimed that it “has serious concerns that Meta Platforms (Meta) has engaged in systematic, wilful and unlawful misappropriation of Twitter’s trade secrets and other intellectual property”.