The Mail on Sunday sought Waterfront’s analysis as part of the newspaper’s special investigation into counterfeit goods.
The paper ran a major article as part of its probe into sales of accurate copies of clothes, bags and shoes by a Chinese-run website. It sought comments from Waterfront’s Joint Head of Intellectual Property and Dispute Resolution, Matthew Harris, regarding the possibility of pursuing those responsible.
It was alleged that the site sells cut-price goods that look almost identical to expensive items produced and sold by the likes of Chanel and Hermes. Individual retailers were said to have listed items for sale on the DHgate online site, describing them as replicas, and picture them without any accompanying branding.
Matthew explained that it is difficult for the established designer brands to act against those who are involved in the selling of counterfeit goods online.
There are ways in which it is possible to tackle this online infringing activity, but even if one site or advertisement is taken down, often another will quickly take its place. Matthew compared the process to “a game of whack-a-mole.’’
To read the full article visit Mail Online.
A recent EU trade mark application for the word mark, PUT PUTIN IN, has been refused by the European Union Intellectual Property Office on the grounds of being contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality. While a fairly straightforward decision, this is a timely reminder…
Late yesterday UK time, it was reported that a lawyer for Twitter had sent a letter to Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg complaining about Meta’s new Threads app. Twitter claimed that it “has serious concerns that Meta Platforms (Meta) has engaged in systematic, wilful and unlawful misappropriation of Twitter’s trade secrets and other intellectual property”.
Copyright litigation proceedings brought in London’s Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC) against John Lewis, and its cartoon dragon ‘Excitable Edgar’, have been dismissed.