In the case of Bear Scotland v Fulton the Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT) looked at whether non-guaranteed overtime payments should be included in the calculation of holiday pay. The ruling is of relevance to any business which pays overtime or commission.
For example, if you have an employee who is contracted to work 20 hours per week but who usually works an extra five hours in non-guaranteed overtime, how much do you pay them when they take a week’s holiday? The short answer, according to Bear Scotland, is 25 hours pay not 20 hours.
For many years, employers have been paying the lower amount without issue. However, several cases have challenged this practice as being incompatible with European law. In Bear Scotland the key decisions were:
Before this decision there was much concern about the scope for back-pay claims going back years. However, the EAT has given businesses something of a break by severely limiting the scope for such claims.
The case is not going to be appealed by the employees, but we may see other cases which seek to extend the possibility for back-pay claims.
Even as I write, the saga goes on. Yesterday the government announced that it will legislate to limit back-pay claims to the two years before the claim is issued. The new law is expected on 1st July 2015 so there is still time for disgruntled employees to claim for more.
We appreciate that this is a difficult area and what you do next will very much depend on your own circumstances. As a general point, we would advise employers to start assessing the costs, taking advice and putting appropriate strategies in place. We are already working with clients to limit their exposure.
Do you pay overtime or commission? If yes, do you include overtime and commission when calculating holiday pay?
If the answer is no, you may need to update your calculations and you could face a claim for back-pay, so please get in touch to discuss this or any other HR issues by calling the team on 020 7234 0200 or emailing employment@waterfront.law
The Workers (Predictable Terms and Conditions) Act 2023, creates a statutory right for qualifying workers to request a more predictable pattern of work. This right works similarly in a few ways to the right to request a more flexible working pattern.
In the news this week has been the speculation over Manchester United’s decision in respect of their player, Mason Greenwood. Greenwood was charged with rape and assault, but the charges – which he denies – were dropped back in February. We learnt yesterday that Greenwood’s time with the…
The Employment Relations (Flexible Working) Bill has now completed its journey through parliament and the Employment Relations (Flexible Working) Act 2023 is currently awaiting Royal Assent. What is changing?
Fans of Radio 4’s The Archers will be aware that Brian has sacked Stella as the manager of Home Farm. The background is that Stella spent £150,000 on a new seed drill without Brian’s approval so he has decided to treat the matter as gross misconduct and dismiss her with immediate effect. Stella has taken advice and has been told that she has a good claim of unfair dismissal and possibly sex discrimination too (apparently on the basis that so few farm managers are women). Leaving aside for one moment the fact that The Archers is a work of fiction, does Stella have a claim?