Christmas is fast approaching and with it comes a flood of countdowns, charts and recaps of the year behind us. I’m not one to shy away from clichés, so here is my list of HR issues to watch out for this month.
Juggling the HR issues at Christmas
There is some interesting case law on when an employer could be deemed liable for the discriminatory acts of its employees (including any unwelcome advances after too many sherries). The business could be liable if the act was committed “in the course of employment”. The harassment of an employee by a colleague in the workplace will almost certainly be covered. However, the line becomes blurred with conduct off the premises and out of normal working hours, particularly at social events. An employer might have a defence if it can show that it took “all reasonable steps” to prevent the incident from happening. These could include:
No work today?
The normal position is that unless the contract provides otherwise, employees who are unable to turn up to work (even for reasons outside their control) are not entitled to be paid. There is some debate on this point so it makes sense to spell out the position in your staff handbook or contracts of employment. Bear in mind that if schools are closed some employees might need to take time off to make arrangements for their children. In this scenario, employees have the statutory right to reasonable (unpaid) time off to care for their dependants. They are also protected from dismissal or suffering detriment as a consequence of exercising that right – so it makes sense to get the full facts before disciplining an absent employee. 3. Bonuses Although the issue is not confined to this time of year, some employees may expect a bonus this Christmas. Many employers will use their discretion to make a bonus payment as a gesture of goodwill. Therefore the staff should have no contractual right to the payment, giving them little room to complain if one is not forthcoming. But even if there is nothing in writing they could argue that they have an implied contractual right by reason of custom and practice, if bonuses have been paid on a regular basis. Further difficulties can arise where the employer has provided the incentive of a bonus scheme. The first question is whether the scheme is contractual or non-contractual. This should be a clear answer but the courts have become increasingly willing to find that bonus schemes expressed to be non-contractual or discretionary give rise to contractual rights. The subject of bonuses is complicated and it is important to strike the balance between promoting loyalty among your staff and placing yourself under a heavy financial burden. It is important to take advice and ensure that bonus provisions are tailored to your needs. However a well-drafted non-contractual bonus clause or policy should make it clear that:
If you would like advice on any of the issues raised above, or indeed any other employment law matters, then please contact one of our employment solicitors who are specialists in this area. They can be contacted on 020 7234 0200 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
The Workers (Predictable Terms and Conditions) Act 2023, creates a statutory right for qualifying workers to request a more predictable pattern of work. This right works similarly in a few ways to the right to request a more flexible working pattern.
In the news this week has been the speculation over Manchester United’s decision in respect of their player, Mason Greenwood. Greenwood was charged with rape and assault, but the charges – which he denies – were dropped back in February. We learnt yesterday that Greenwood’s time with the…
The Employment Relations (Flexible Working) Bill has now completed its journey through parliament and the Employment Relations (Flexible Working) Act 2023 is currently awaiting Royal Assent. What is changing?
Fans of Radio 4’s The Archers will be aware that Brian has sacked Stella as the manager of Home Farm. The background is that Stella spent £150,000 on a new seed drill without Brian’s approval so he has decided to treat the matter as gross misconduct and dismiss her with immediate effect. Stella has taken advice and has been told that she has a good claim of unfair dismissal and possibly sex discrimination too (apparently on the basis that so few farm managers are women). Leaving aside for one moment the fact that The Archers is a work of fiction, does Stella have a claim?