This month we had a glimpse into the world of high stakes gambling and a reminder of the risks an employer can face when giving a reference.
In Playboy Club London Limited v Banca Nazionale Del Lavoro SPA, an Italian bank gave a reference to the Playboy Club casino in Mayfair. The reference was in respect of one of the bank’s customers and assured the casino that he was “trustworthy up to the extent of £1.6 million in any one week”. On the strength of this statement, the casino allowed the customer credit of over £1 million.
It turned out that the customer had never held any money with the bank and the reference had been sent by a bank employee who was not authorised to give them.
The court found that the bank was negligent for providing an inaccurate reference. It did not matter that the bank employee did not have authority: the casino was entitled to rely on her apparent authority and she was acting in the course of her employment so the bank was liable.
Disputes over employment references are fairly common. Typically an individual hands in their notice, eager to start a new job, but then finds that the job offer has been withdrawn because their references aren’t satisfactory. They cannot withdraw their resignation (unless their employer agrees) and they no longer have a new job lined up. With the prospect of no income on the horizon, the individual will be assessing their losses and considering the merits of a claim against the business that provided the reference.
Here are five pointers to bear in mind when it comes to references:
If you would like to discuss these issues or you would like help introducing a reference policy, please contact one of the employment team on 020 7234 0200 or email email@example.com
Most employers are keen to avoid dismissing staff in whom they have invested time and money but this is not always possible.
Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs), sometimes referred to as “gagging clauses”, are rarely out of the news.
On 5 December 2022, following its Making Flexible Working The Default consultation, which has now concluded, the UK government announced that it will be introducing reforms to the law around employees’ rights to make flexible working requests.
I was interested to read the recent reports in the Guardian and BBC News that Elon Musk has sent an email which requires all staff to sign a commitment to working “long hours at high intensity” and being “extremely hardcore”. They report that the alternative is that they will receive three months’ severance pay.